Last week, the German court in Koblenz began hearing evidence for the trial against two former Syrian state officials, Anwar R. and Eyad A. The two men came to Germany seeking asylum, after having defected from the Syrian government. Anwar R. was charged with torture, murder, rape, and sexual assault, while Eyad A. was charged with aiding and abetting crimes against humanity.
The Syrian civil war has remained largely unsolvable from a peace-keeping perspective, and largely untouchable from a legal perspective. Yet, Germany is trying one of the most meaningful criminal cases in the international community in recent years. This comes at a time when local court systems around the world are shutting down, reducing the number of cases heard, or adapting to online forums. Despite a global pandemic, some of the victims of the Syrian civil war are going to have their day in court.
The step to prosecute Syrian state officials is monumental because no other court system has successfully brought such a case to trial. Attempts to try Syrian state officials in other courts have primarily been thwarted, for example Russia and China voted to block United Nations referral to the International Criminal Court (ICC) and Spain’s court dismissed the criminal case against Syrian state officials for lack of jurisdiction. While there has been some notable successes, such as the conviction of a “low-level” soldier in Sweden for war crimes, high ranking officials in the Syrian government have evaded prosecution.
Germany’s progress poses a greater question regarding the future of international crimes: Will they be primarily tried in international courts and tribunals, or will they be “outsourced” to domestic courts? German action in the Syrian case suggests that the future of international criminal prosecution will be in the hands of individual states, who step up when international organisations and courts do not. Additionally, a pattern has emerged among the individual states who are attempting to try cases connected to the Syrian civil war. The pattern indicates that states who experience an influx of refugees and asylum seekers may be the ones best suited for prosecution of international crimes committed on foreign soil. Germany had more access to witnesses and more support for this prosecution in part because of the number of witnesses that are now living within their borders.
To properly prepare for the outsourcing of international crimes committed in other countries, states must consider a few key things. Continue reading
►The ASIL International Economic Law Interest Group, the Canadian Council on International Law, and The Centre For International Governance Innovation, together with McGill University Faculty Of Law are organising a Joint North American Conference on International Economic Law that incorporates the 2018 ASIL IEcLIG Biennial. It will be held at McGill University Faculty of Law, Montreal, Quebec, Canada,
It is our pleasure to introduce Fernanda Frizzo Bragato who has co-authored a post with IntLawGrrls contributor and senior editor Jocelyn Getgen Kestenbaum about indigenous land rights and protective institutions in Brazil. Fernanda is Full Professor of Law at Unisinos Law School (Brazil) since 2007 where she directs the Human Rights Center, teaches in the Undergrad and Graduate Program, and supervises Master and PhD students. In 2017, she was Fulbright Visiting Scholar at Cardozo Law School. Fernanda conducts research and publishes articles in human rights theory, decolonial thinking, and indigenous rights. Since 2015, her work is focused on indigenous land rights/conflicts in Brazil in the context of risk for atrocities. Fernanda graduated in Law at Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul and holds a Master and PhD degree in Law from Unisinos. She is currently CNPq Researcher in Brazil.
Akila Radhakrishnan is the President (acting) of the Global Justice Center. She directs GJC’s strategies and efforts to establish legal precedents protecting human rights and ensuring gender equality. In 2010, she helped to conceptualize GJC’s August 12th Campaign to ensure access to abortion services for girls and women raped in war as a matter of right and has since led legal and advocacy efforts on the project. Akila also leads GJC’s Gender and Genocide project, including to ensure justice and accountability for the Yazidi genocide and is a key member of GJC’s Burma project team. In her role, Akila has authored numerous shadow reports, legal briefs and advocacy documents and provided legal expertise to domestic and international stakeholders and policymakers, including the International Criminal Court, the United Nations, the European Union and state governments. Akila has been published widely on issues of international law, gender equality and human rights, including in the New York Times, Time, The Atlantic, Women Under Siege, Ms. Magazine, and Rewire.
Kristin Smith is a Legal Fellow at the
Emily is pursuing her J.D. at Stanford, where she focuses on international humanitarian and human rights law and co-directs the school’s IRAP chapter. She is particularly interested in United States complicity in human rights and humanitarian law violations in the MENA region. Before law school, she spent several years in Jordan, first on a Fulbright research grant, then as Syria researcher for local think tank, the West Asia-North Africa (WANA) Institute.
It is our great pleasure to welcome our new IntLawGrrls Contributor Madalyn K. Wasilczuk! Madalyn is a Clinical Teaching Fellow in the Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide, where she works with the International Human Rights Clinic and the Death Penalty Project. At Cornell, Madalyn has specialized in advocating for prisoners’ rights in domestic courts and international tribunals. She has litigated on capital cases in the U.S., Malawi, and Tanzania, and assisted in the representation of a Guantánamo detainee before the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention. Madalyn’s work at Cornell has also focused on the right of self-determination, and she has led students in advocacy efforts before the United Nations in collaboration with human rights defenders in Western Sahara and the Occupied Golan.


It is our great pleasure to introduce our new IntLawGrrls contributor Lisa Davis! Lisa is an Associate Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Human Rights and Gender Justice Clinic (formerly named International Women’s Human Rights Clinic, founded by Prof. Rhonda Copelon). She has written and reported extensively on human rights and gender issues, including on women’s rights and LGBTIQ rights, with a focus on peace building and security issues in conflict and disaster settings. Lisa has testified before U.S. Congress, U.K. Parliament, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and various international human rights bodies. In 2016, she was elected by her peers to deliver the civil society statement for the U.N. Security Council’s open debate on the use of sexual violence in conflict situations.